Skip to main content
Dakota County Logo
File #: DC-1852    Version:
Type: Consent Action Status: Passed
File created: 2/1/2023 In control: Board of Commissioners
On agenda: 2/28/2023 Final action: 2/28/2023
Enactment date: 2/28/2023 Resolution #: 23-079
Title: Authorization To Amend Professional Services Contract With Wold Architects And Engineers For Crisis And Recovery Center
Sponsors: Parks, Facilities, and Fleet Management
Attachments: 1. Financial Summary
DEPARTMENT: Parks, Facilities, and Fleet Management
FILE TYPE: Consent Action

TITLE
title
Authorization To Amend Professional Services Contract With Wold Architects And Engineers For Crisis And Recovery Center
end

RESOLUTION
body
WHEREAS, Dakota County Community Services, in partnership with Guild Inc., submitted a grant to the Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS) to build a Regional Behavioral Health Crisis Services Center; and

WHEREAS, the grant submission was authorized by the Dakota County Board in Resolution No. 21-387 (July 20, 2021); and

WHEREAS, the grant was successful, and by Resolution No. 22-095 (March 8, 2022), the Board accepted the $3,459,928 in state funds for the project; and

WHEREAS, the predesign, based on a site selection at the Northern Service Center property in West St. Paul, was presented to the Board, and the project was authorized to proceed into design by Resolution No. 22-254 (June 21, 2021); and

WHEREAS, Capital Projects Management used a Request for Proposals process to unanimously recommend Wold Architects and Engineers to provide design services for this project; and

WHEREAS, Wold Architects and Engineers was approved by Resolution No. 22-306 (July 19, 2022) to provide design services for this project and to enter into a professional services contract; and

WHEREAS, the Core Planning Group and Wold completed the schematic design phase of the project; and

WHEREAS, Capital Projects Management staff solicited an independent cost estimate and compared that to a second estimate provided by the design consultant to conclude that the project as designed exceeded the project budget; and

WHEREAS, staff worked through a value engineering process to try to align the project scope and size with the budget, only to find the project still exceeded the approved budget; and

WHEREAS, the project schematic design was presented, and a project budget amendment was requested at the Physical Development Committee Meeting on Januar...

Click here for full text